The “Manila Envelope Reading was very interesting because it discusses questions about the change from physical to digital records. The reading, specifically questions of schools, preserves students’ work in today’s day and age. “There was no manila envelope—physical or digital—for much of her sixth-grade schoolwork” (Watters 3). This is an example of how digital tools can fail to provide access to their work. There was a story of a student that was told that led me to question whether schools are putting enough effort into ensuring students keep their work. A student returned her iPad with all of her drawings, and she had access to them once she gave it back. I wonder if schools’ main concern is money and efficiency rather than what is in the best interest of the students. This reminds me of when I was in high school. When entering the 9th grade, every student receives a school Google account where all our assignments are stored. After graduation, that account is deleted without any notice.
“Controlling Our Own Technologies” discusses the importance of gaining control of our work and tools. The idea of “convivial tools” was very interesting. It discusses the idea of creating technology that empowers the user rather than controlling them. “Education technology has become about control, surveillance, and data extraction” (Watters 35). This statement is very true. For example, recently, TikTok has been targeted for potentially stealing data from its users. This program isn’t the first to be accused. Years ago, the same accusation was made against Facebook. Much of our personal data is collected without our consent.
Leave a Reply